Skip to content

refactor(experimentation): drop Snowflake warehouse support - #8684

Closed
Zaimwa9 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
refactor/remove-snowflake-warehouse
Closed

Zaimwa9 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
refactor/remove-snowflake-warehouse

Conversation

@Zaimwa9

@Zaimwa9 Zaimwa9 commented Oct 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
  • I have read the Contributing Guide.
  • I have added information to docs/ if required so people know about the feature.
  • I have filled in the "Changes" section below.
  • I have filled in the "How did you test this code" section below.

Changes

Removes the Snowflake warehouse type from the backend. It was config-only: events never reached it and results could not be computed.

  • Drops WarehouseType.SNOWFLAKE, its config types and the snowflake provider.
  • Migration 0017 soft-deletes active Snowflake connections (reverse is a no-op) and narrows the warehouse_type choices.
  • Creating a Snowflake connection now returns 400.

How did you test this code?

Unit tests, including the migration.

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Oct 6, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

3 Skipped Deployments
Project Deployment Actions Updated
docs Ignored Ignored Preview Oct 6, 2026 11:30am UTC
flagsmith-frontend-preview Ignored Ignored Preview Oct 6, 2026 11:30am UTC
flagsmith-frontend-staging Ignored Ignored Preview Oct 6, 2026 11:30am UTC

Request Review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Draft PR not reviewed

Draft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.

  • Trigger a manual review

To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true
  • Autopilot · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added api Issue related to the REST API refactor labels Oct 6, 2026
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Oct 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.84%. Comparing base (7dfcd9a) to head (09d29f5).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8684      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.84%   98.84%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1663     1663              
  Lines       68516    68407     -109     
==========================================
- Hits        67726    67617     -109     
  Misses        790      790              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@Zaimwa9

Zaimwa9 commented Oct 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Closing following potential re-planning of Snowflake

@Zaimwa9 Zaimwa9 closed this Oct 7, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

api Issue related to the REST API refactor

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant