util.inspect throws when given a ZodError

Version

v24.11.1

Platform

Darwin <hostname> 24.6.0 Darwin Kernel Version 24.6.0: Mon Aug 11 21:16:34 PDT 2025; root:xnu-11417.140.69.701.11~1/RELEASE_ARM64_T6020 arm64

Subsystem

util

What steps will reproduce the bug?

Using zod@3.25.76

const { inspect } = require('node:util');
const { z } = require('zod');

inspect(z.object({ foo: z.string() }).safeParse().error);

How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

Seems to happen on any ZodError

What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

It should inspect the error, same as it did on Node v22

What do you see instead?

Exception.

node:internal/util/inspect:1183
    if (!isStackOverflowError(err)) throw err;
                                    ^

TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'value')
    at formatProperty (node:internal/util/inspect:2279:12)
    at formatRaw (node:internal/util/inspect:1176:9)
    at formatValue (node:internal/util/inspect:932:10)
    at inspect (node:internal/util/inspect:409:10)
    at Object.<anonymous> (/junk.js:4:1)
    at Module._compile (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1761:14)
    at Object..js (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1893:10)
    at Module.load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1481:32)
    at Module._load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1300:12)
    at TracingChannel.traceSync (node:diagnostics_channel:328:14)

Node.js v24.11.1

Additional information

I believe this is a regression caused by 748d4f6 - based on the timing / line numbers.

Given code to reproduce works fine in version v26.0.0-pre

@siaeyy

@siaeyy I can reproduce it with the mentioned zod version.

@siaeyy I can reproduce it with the mentioned zod version.

Sorry, I was using the latest version of zod

@mnahkies

So the root cause is that the zod error has an errors property that is not an own property.

With the change there are two properties were this could happen: cause and errors on errors. All other properties behave regularly and would not need a different handling. It is not an issue for most errors, since they would have these as own non-enumerable properties.

The best fix I could think of right now is adding this right after the desc ??= ObjectGetOwnPropertyDescriptor(value, key) in the formatProperty() method:

  while (desc === undefined) {
    value = ObjectGetPrototypeOf(value);
    desc = ObjectGetOwnPropertyDescriptor(value, key);
  }

That way it will have the correct enumerability and show that it is a getter. That would otherwise not be possible.

I am just not happy that we seemingly have to add a special handling there just for these two properties.

@mnahkies @siaeyy would one of you be willing to open a PR with that change and adding a regression test for both mentioned properties?

Of course I am willing to open a PR :)

It will actually be possible to handle it in a different spot as well by using the newly introduced extraKeys. The handler for those could than loop through the prototypes as described. That way the loop is only used in case extra keys are needed, which is a rarer case. This will however not have a real impact on the performance, due to the insignificance of the check compared to the rest of the algorithm. It just feels cleaner, due to also not having to manipulate the keys in those places anymore. The downside is that the main method will become even bigger than before.

I think here is a example of different spot:

node/lib/internal/util/inspect.js

Lines 1958 to 1972 in 4a868fd

    
           if ('cause' in err && 
        
               (keys.length === 0 || !ArrayPrototypeIncludes(keys, 'cause'))) { 
        
             ArrayPrototypePush(keys, 'cause'); 
        
           } 
        
           // Print errors aggregated into AggregateError 
        
           try { 
        
             const errors = err.errors; 
        
             if (ArrayIsArray(errors) && 
        
               (keys.length === 0 || !ArrayPrototypeIncludes(keys, 'errors'))) { 
        
               ArrayPrototypePush(keys, 'errors'); 
        
             } 
        
           } catch { 
        
             // If errors is a getter that throws, we ignore the error. 
        
           }

@siaeyy

@siaeyy I am not sure I follow. That code is the root cause of the problem, correct. It adds keys that have to be handled, while not knowing who the owning object is. That is why I named these two properties above :)

This just broke our tests after a Node upgrade. ("fortunately", otherwise this would have badly failed in production)

console logging methods failing in this manner is... very bad, as they should never throw an exception – these are quite often used in places eg. error handlers themselves, in which throwing another exception can cause a catastrophic failure (with possible permanent state corruption).

I'd suggest looking into adding a general error boundary for console methods, as that's the software engineering best practice for situations like these.

util: limit `inspect` to only show own properties

@aduh95

@aduh95, it seems that the fix hasn't been included in v24 yet. Will the fix get included in v24 soon? This bug prevents people from updating to the latest version, which is particularly important now that multiple vulnerabilities were fixed in the latest release yesterday.

util: limit `inspect` to only show own properties

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

util.inspect throws when given a ZodError #60717

Version

Platform

Subsystem

What steps will reproduce the bug?

How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

What do you see instead?

Additional information

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

	if ('cause' in err &&
	(keys.length === 0 \|\| !ArrayPrototypeIncludes(keys, 'cause'))) {
	ArrayPrototypePush(keys, 'cause');
	}

	// Print errors aggregated into AggregateError
	try {
	const errors = err.errors;
	if (ArrayIsArray(errors) &&
	(keys.length === 0 \|\| !ArrayPrototypeIncludes(keys, 'errors'))) {
	ArrayPrototypePush(keys, 'errors');
	}
	} catch {
	// If errors is a getter that throws, we ignore the error.
	}

util.inspect throws when given a ZodError #60717

Description

Version

Platform

Subsystem

What steps will reproduce the bug?

How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

What do you see instead?

Additional information

Activity

siaeyy commented on Nov 15, 2025

BridgeAR commented on Nov 15, 2025

siaeyy commented on Nov 15, 2025

BridgeAR commented on Nov 15, 2025

siaeyy commented on Nov 15, 2025

BridgeAR commented on Nov 15, 2025

siaeyy commented on Nov 15, 2025

BridgeAR commented on Nov 15, 2025

jaenw commented on Dec 19, 2025

ollipa commented on Jan 14, 2026

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions