Remove automation approval github actions - #8660
3 benchmarks regressed
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚠️ Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.
⚡ 4 improved benchmarks
❌ 3 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1638 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 4 skipped benchmarks1
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | Simulation | chunked_varbinview_canonical_into[(1000, 10)] |
154.7 µs | 191 µs | -19.01% |
| ❌ | Simulation | slice_empty_vortex |
310.3 ns | 368.6 ns | -15.83% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compact_sliced[(4096, 90)] |
750 ns | 837.5 ns | -10.45% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[128] |
273.6 ns | 215.3 ns | +27.1% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[1024] |
333.9 ns | 275.6 ns | +21.17% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[2048] |
427.8 ns | 369.4 ns | +15.79% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | chunked_varbinview_opt_canonical_into[(100, 100)] |
341 µs | 305.8 µs | +11.52% |
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing rk/claude-workflows (0da3a16) with develop (1743bb0)
Footnotes
-
4 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩